Why the study?
Acute myocardial infarction is associated with greater utilization of healthcare resources and financial expenditure, but temporal trends over time required evaluation.
Despite a decline in the utilization of most healthcare services following AMI over a decade, overall healthcare expenditure remained unchanged.
Shifts in post-AMI utilization without cost reduction should not yet change practice; leaves open drivers of stable expenditures.
BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with greater utilization of healthcare resources and financial expenditure. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate temporal trends in healthcare resource utilization and costs following AMI throughout 2003-2015. METHODS: AMI patients who survived the first year following hospitalization in a tertiary medical center (Soroka University Medical Center) throughout 2002-2012 were included and followed until 2015. Length of the in-hospital stay (LOS), emergency department (ED), primary care, outpatient consulting clinic visits and other ambulatory services, and their costs, were evaluated and compared annually over time. RESULTS: Overall 8047 patients qualified for the current study; mean age 65.0 (SD = 13.6) years, 30.3% women. During follow-up, LOS and the number of primary care visits has decreased significantly. However, ED and consultant visits as well as ambulatory-services utilization has increased. Total costs have decreased throughout this period. Multivariate analysis, adjusted for potential confounders, showed as significant trend of decrease in LOS and ambulatory-services utilization, yet an increase in ED visits with no change in total costs. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a decline in utilization of most healthcare services throughout the investigated decade, healthcare expenditure has not changed. Further evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of long-term resource allocation following AMI is warranted. Nevertheless, we believe more intense ambulatory follow-up focusing on secondary prevention and early detection, as well as high-quality outpatient chest pain unit are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shiyovich et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: