Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A 2‐year lysimeter experiment was conducted to determine the fate of nitrogen (N) in pig effluent applied to a shallow stony pasture soil. In the first year (1991), pig effluent was applied in a single application at three rates of total N (0, 200, and 600 kg N/ha) to 12 monolith lysimeters (500 mm diameter × 450 mm deep) during autumn (March). In the second year of the experiment, the 200 kg N/ha lysimeters received a repeat application using 15 N‐labelled effluent. Application at the 200 kg N/ha rate resulted in: 10% of the applied N being lost by ammonia volatilisation; 5% being leached (11 kg N/ha) in the first year and less than 2.5% of applied 15 N being leached in the second year; 35% of the applied effluent 15 N was recovered by the pasture; and 14% was recovered in the soil plus roots. Denitrification losses (estimated by difference) were high (39%) and were attributed to the soluble carbon content of the effluent, a supply of nitrate from nitrification of slurry N, and transient anaerobic conditions which probably occurred at the soil/gravel interface. Application at the 600 kg N/ha rate resulted in a large leaching loss (116 kg N/ha) and a high concentration of NO3‐N in the drainage water. Application of effluent at either rate resulted in a considerable increase in pasture production, and this was attributed to improved plant nutrition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cameron et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: