Why the study?
Does olmesartan monotherapy reduce proteinuria in non-diabetic renal patients, and is this effect predicted by baseline GFR?
Does olmesartan monotherapy reduce proteinuria in non-diabetic renal patients, and is this effect predicted by baseline GFR?
Olmesartan monotherapy significantly reduces proteinuria in non-diabetic renal patients, but the relative efficacy is restricted by reduced baseline GFR.
Olmesartan may reduce albuminuria in non-diabetic CKD; leaves open GFR-dependent efficacy for prospective confirmation.
INTRODUCTION: It is known that reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a crucial factor to limit the blood pressure lowering effect of antihypertensives. In the present study, we tested whether the effects of monotherapy with an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) to lower proteinuria could be restricted by reduced GFR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five renal patients who had albuminuria more than 30 mg/day, but did not have diabetic nephropathy or nephrotic syndrome, were studied before and during eight weeks of monotherapy with ARB, olmesartan. RESULTS: Blood pressure was lowered from 129 ± 18/79 ± 12 to 116 ± 18/72 ± 12 mmHg (p < 0.0001), while albuminuria was reduced from 614±630 to 343±472 mg/day (p < 0.0001). Albuminuria was inversely correlated with GFR both before and during treatment. Albuminuria reduction was enhanced as plasma renin activity (p = 0.047) and dose of olmesartan were increased (p = 0.04). Although the absolute reduction in proteinuria was not correlated with GFR (p = 0.56), the % reduction was significantly proportional with GFR (p = 0.027). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that 64% of proteinuria reduction could be explained by baseline levels of albuminuria, GFR and renin activity. CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in proteinuria by olmesartan may be roughly predicted using baseline GFR and other parameters. These findings clarify that the effect of ARB on proteinuria reduction is restricted by reduced GFR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ono et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: