Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
(w/w), which was 8.4 times that of counterpart clinically used microporous polysaccharide hemospheres, Arista. And poly(DEX-GMA/AAc) showed very short gelation time of 10-13 s. As a result, a gelled film could be formed rapidly after poly(DEX-GMA/AAc) absorbed water in blood when used on wounds, and then staunched bleeding. Poly(DEX-GMA/AAc) microgel particles showed better clotting ability than commercial hemostatic agent Flashclot in vitro. In addition, poly(DEX-GMA/AAc) did not cause exothermic burn when absorbing liquid, which was superior to Flashclot. No obvious toxicity was found in cytotoxicity study and skin irritancy test. Blood loss and hemostasis time were dramatically reduced by poly(DEX-GMA/AAc) microgel particles in hemorrhage models of ear vein, ear artery, liver and femoral artery in rabbits. These results indicated that the poly(DEX-GMA/AAc) microgel particles are a potential hemostatic agent with almost no cytotoxicity and good biocompatibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: