Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A new processing route for manufacturing partially interconnected open‐cell, microcellular mullite ceramics has been developed. The strategy adopted for making microcellular mullite ceramics entailed the following steps: (i) fabricating a formed body from combining polysiloxane, Al 2 O 3 (a reactive filler), polymer microbeads (used as sacrificial templates), and Y 2 O 3 (a sintering additive); (ii) cross‐linking the polysiloxane in the formed body; (iii) transforming the polysiloxane by pyrolysis into SiO 2 ; and (iv) synthesizing mullite by reacting SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 . By controlling the sintering temperature and the microbead and additive contents, it was possible to adjust the porosity so that it ranged from 38% to 85%. The compressive strengths of the microcellular ceramics with ∼40% and ∼70% porosities were ∼90 and ∼10 MPa, respectively. The superior compressive strengths were attributed to the homogeneous distribution of small (≤20 μm), spherical cells with dense struts in the microcellular ceramics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: