Why the study?
Do embryonic stem cells or myoblasts improve cardiac function and engraft in a mouse model of genetic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Do embryonic stem cells or myoblasts improve cardiac function and engraft in a mouse model of genetic dilated cardiomyopathy?
In a mouse model of nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, myoblast transplantation stabilized cardiac function and engrafted successfully, whereas committed embryonic stem cells failed to integrate and did not prevent functional decline.
Myoblast transplantation may preserve function in genetic cardiomyopathy models; leaves open translation of stem cell therapy to human dilated cardiomyopathy.
The functional and architectural benefits of embryonic stem cells (ESC) and myoblasts (Mb) transplantations into infarcted myocardium have been investigated extensively. Whereas ESC repopulated fibrotic areas and contributed to myocardial regeneration, Mb exerted their effects through paracrine secretions and scar remodeling. This therapeutic perspective, however, has been less explored in the setting of nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathies (DCMs). Our aim was to compare the integration and functional efficacy of ESC committed to cardiac fate by bone morphogenic protein 2 (BMP-2) pretreatment and Mb used as gold standard following their transplantation into the myocardium of a mouse model of laminopathy exhibiting a progressive and lethal DCM. After 4 and 8 weeks of transplantation, stabilization was observed in Mb-transplanted mice (P = 0.008) but not in groups of ESC-transplanted or medium-injected animals, where the left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS) decreased by 32 ± 8% and 41 ± 8% respectively. Engrafted differentiated cells were consistently detected in myocardia of mice receiving Mb, whereas few or no cells were detected in the hearts of mice receiving ESC, except in two cases where teratomas were formed. These data suggest that committed ESC fail to integrate in DCM where scar tissue is absent to provide the appropriate niche, whereas the functional benefits of Mb transplantation might extend to nonischemic cardiomyopathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Catelain et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: