Why the study?
Do ACE inhibitors (zofenopril, fosinopril) improve outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction or carotid artery disease?
Do ACE inhibitors (zofenopril, fosinopril) improve outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction or carotid artery disease?
This review highlights the potential of ACE inhibitors for primary and secondary cardiovascular protection, setting the stage for results from key trials like PHYLLIS, SMILE, and FAMIS.
The potential of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors to protect the heart is a topic that has emerged recently as matter of scientific discussion. Experimental and clinical studies have shown the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors on the metabolism, function, and structure of healthy and damaged hearts and these studies support the concept of both primary and secondary “cardioprotection” with these drugs. More recently, the prevention of atherosclerotic lesions has been demonstrated in animal models, extending the concept to a more general definition of “cardiovascular” protection with ACE inhibitors involving both the heart and the vessels. The potential role of ACE inhibitors on the primary prevention of atherosclerotic disease in humans is currently evaluated in PHYLLIS (Plaque HYpertension Lipid Lowering Italian Study), a multicenter clinical trial in which fosinopril sodium, a new ACE inhibitor, is administered to hypertensive patients with at least one uncomplicated carotid artery lesion. The primary aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of the drug on the long-term (3 years) progression of carotid artery atherosclerosis, noninvasively detected by B-mode ultrasound imaging. In addition to studies on primary prevention, some large clinical trials have been conducted to establish the role of ACE inhibitors on secondary prevention, in particular in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). The beneficial effect of these drugs is well established when administered in the subacute phase of acute MI. The efficacy with early administration has been evaluated recently in several trials, in particular, the SMILE (Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long-term Evaluation) study, an Italian multicenter clinical trial, conducted in a large high-risk patient population with anterior myocardial damage in which zofenopril calcium, a newly developed ACE inhibitor, was administered within 24 h after the onset of symptoms. The primary end-point was the evaluation of both short-term (6 weeks) and long-term (1 year) incidence of mortality and severe congestive heart failure. The final results of this study soon will be available along with the results of another trial, FAMIS (Fosinopril Acute Myocardial Infarction Study), in which the effect of an early ACE inhibition with fosinopril sodium on postinfarctual ventricular remodeling has been assessed by echocardiography during a 3-month period in patients with anterior acute MI undergoing thrombolytic therapy within 8 h after infarction. These trials, together with other currently ongoing studies, should clarify the role of ACE inhibition in many aspects of cardiovascular disease. Am J Hypertens 1994;7:96S-101S
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borghi et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: