Why the study?
Does subcutaneous treprostinil improve exercise capacity and hemodynamics in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Does subcutaneous treprostinil improve exercise capacity and hemodynamics in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Subcutaneous treprostinil improves short-term exercise capacity and hemodynamics in PAH, though trials were not powered for survival benefit.
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has traditionally been considered as an inevitably fatal disease. In the 1980s, a national registry funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) described the natural history of idiopathic PAH 1. The median survival was <3 yrs and prognosis was mostly related to baseline functional capacity and pulmonary haemodynamics. In case series, the long-term outcome of patients with PAH associated with connective tissue disease, portal hypertension and HIV infection appeared to be even worse 2. This was before the era of PAH-specific therapies. In the last decade, significant advances in the current understanding of the disease have led to the development of new specific treatments. In 1996, a placebo-controlled trial demonstrated significant survival benefit with i.v. epoprostenol in idiopathic PAH patients 3. Several other therapies, including prostacyclin analogues, endothelin receptor antagonists and phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors, were subsequently evaluated in short-term randomised placebo-controlled trials. These studies demonstrated improvements in pulmonary haemodynamics, exercise capacity and quality of life 4–6. This new era of therapy has clearly brought enthusiasm among physicians. From a clinician's perspective, the glass has been half filled. Treprostinil s.c. was evaluated in a large randomised placebo-controlled trial involving 470 PAH patients randomised to either s.c. treprostinil or placebo 7. Over a 12-week period, s.c. treprostinil improved patients’ exercise capacity, PAH-related symptoms and haemodynamics. The median placebo-corrected increase in 6-min walking distance was 16 m, with greater improvements in severely ill patients at baseline and in those who could tolerate the highest doses. Unfortunately, this short-term trial, as with others, was underpowered and not designed to detect survival benefit. Indeed, the most ill patients are no longer entered into placebo-controlled …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S. Provencher (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: