Why the study?
Excessive post-MI inflammation drives left ventricular remodelling, and pioglitazone regulates macrophage polarization to the reparative M2 subtype, but its therapeutic effects and mechanisms using a drug delivery system required validation.
Does local delivery of pioglitazone-incorporated microspheres improve cardiac function and remodeling in a rat model of myocardial infarction?
Does local delivery of pioglitazone-incorporated microspheres improve cardiac function and remodeling in a rat model of myocardial infarction?
Sustained local delivery of pioglitazone via microspheres improves cardiac function and attenuates adverse remodeling after myocardial infarction in a rat model by promoting M2 macrophage polarization.
Supports PGZ delivery systems in animal MI models; leaves open clinical translation.
OBJECTIVES: Excessive and chronic inflammation after a myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with left ventricular remodelling and impaired cardiac function. Among inflammatory cells, macrophages play a critical role in polarizing proinflammatory M1 or the reparative M2 subtype. Pioglitazone (PGZ) is reported to regulate macrophage polarization to the M2 subtype. Our goal was to validate the therapeutic effects and the mechanisms of PGZ utilizing a drug delivery system. METHODS: Poly L-lactic-co-glycolic acid microspheres (MS) incorporating PGZ were prepared. To validate the therapeutic potential of PGZ-MS, Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to permanent left coronary artery ligation to induce an MI. Placebo-MS (100 μg) or PGZ-MS (100 μg) was injected to the infarct region just after induction. Cardiac function and size were assessed by echocardiography. At 28 days after surgery, the rats were sacrificed, and the excised hearts were evaluated histologically. RESULTS: Sustained release of PGZ from the PGZ-MS was confirmed in vitro. PGZ-MS significantly rehabilitated cardiac dysfunction after an MI (fractional shortening: MI vs MI+placebo-MS vs MI+PGZ-MS, 24.4 ± 1.1 vs 24.3 ± 1.6 vs 32.2 ± 1.4%; P = 0.0035) with reverse remodelling. Immunohistochemical analyses revealed that PGZ-MS enhanced macrophage polarization (ratio of M2 subtype: 0.39 ± 0.03 vs 0.42 ± 0.02 vs 0.54 ± 0.02; P = 0.0004) and attenuated apoptosis of cardiomyocytes in the ischaemic border zone. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed macrophage polarization by sustained release of PGZ, which resulted in amelioration of adverse left ventricular remodelling and cardiac dysfunction. Drug delivery system-based macrophage polarization might serve as a promising strategy in cardiac regenerative therapy for ischaemic heart disease. (241 words).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Konegawa et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: