Expert consensus establishes minimum standards for blood pressure assessment in research to improve accuracy and reproducibility.
Adoption of these standards should enhance BP data quality and reproducibility in trials; extends prior guidelines to adults and children.
INTRODUCTION: Although inaccurate, nonreproducible blood pressure values can result from nonstandardized assessments, recommended approaches to standardize blood pressure measurement are often not followed in research studies. METHODS: An expert consensus of national and international health and scientific organizations developed recommended minimum standards for assessing blood pressure in research subjects where: (i) blood pressure or hypertension is a major endpoint, or (ii) blood pressure is likely a major mediator of the research outcome. RESULTS: Minimum research standards are presented for training of observers, technical aspects of assessing blood pressure, and equipment for both adults and children. DISCUSSION: The standards are based on prior recommendations, some of which did not conform to current evidence-based methods. All new research should require adherence to these minimum standards on the patient populations described above. Readers need to use caution in interpreting studies if the standards are not met in the defined populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2017 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: