Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Alloy anodes present promising alternatives to alkali metals in solid-state batteries but still face morphological instability upon cycling. Unlike conventional batteries using liquid electrolytes, interfacial evolution between solid-state electrolytes and alloy anodes is determined by interfacial electrochemistry and mechanics. Here, we adapt a classical chemomechanical model for Li metal to apply to alloy anodes. This allows generalizing a principle, namely, the hard and soft electrolytes and alloy anodes pairing principle, to guide improving morphological stability. Specifically, “hard” (high-shear-modulus) ceramic electrolytes should be paired with “harder” alloys, while “soft” (low-shear-modulus) polymer electrolytes favor “softer” alloys. We examine the chemomechanical properties of several Li–M alloys (M = Al, Mg, In, Sn, and Sb). Consistent with the principle, the “harder” Li–Sn anode exhibits a flattened morphology with the “hard” Li 6 PS 5 Cl electrolyte after cycling. Conversely, the “softer” Li–In anode evolves extremely rough, indicating Li–In dendrite formation. Our work underscores the significance of tuning alloy anode mechanical properties, incorporating well-established rules in traditional metallurgy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: