Why the study?
Does cilostazol and/or probucol improve safety and efficacy outcomes compared to aspirin and/or no probucol in patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke or TIA at high risk of cerebral hemorrhage?
Does cilostazol and/or probucol improve safety and efficacy outcomes compared to aspirin and/or no probucol in patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke or TIA at high risk of cerebral hemorrhage?
The PICASSO study is designed to determine the optimal antiplatelet and lipid-lowering therapy (cilostazol vs aspirin, probucol vs none) in ischemic stroke patients at high risk for hemorrhagic stroke.
RATIONALE: Prior intracerebral haemorrhage and cerebral microbleeds may increase the risk of haemorrhagic stroke. However, the optimal long-term antiplatelet therapy and lipid management in these patients remain unclear. AIM: PreventIon of CArdiovascular events in iSchemic Stroke patients with high risk of cerebral hemOrrhage was designed to compare cilostazol and aspirin and to assess the effect of adding probucol, a lipid-lowering and anti-oxidative agent, in patients at high risk of haemorrhagic stroke. SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATE: The projected sample size is 1600 patients with at least 12 months of follow-up. METHODS AND DESIGN: PreventIon of CArdiovascular events in iSchemic Stroke patients with high risk of cerebral hemOrrhage is a randomized trial involving 67 institutes from 3 countries. Patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack within 180 days and with prior intracerebral haemorrhage or multiple cerebral microbleeds on gradient echo imaging are eligible. Enrolled patients are simultaneously randomized in a 2 × 2 factorial design: double-blind for cilostazol 200 mg/day vs. aspirin 100 mg/day, and an open-label, blind end-point evaluation for probucol 500 mg/day vs. non-probucol. STUDY OUTCOMES: The co-primary end-points are the safety end-point of haemorrhagic stroke and the efficacy end-point of a composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death. Time-to-event will be analyzed separately for each intervention: superiority testing for the safety of cilostazol over aspirin as well as the efficacy of probucol over non-probucol, and non-inferiority testing for the efficacy of cilostazol to aspirin. DISCUSSION: PreventIon of CArdiovascular events in iSchemic Stroke patients with high risk of cerebral hemOrrhage is the largest secondary stroke prevention trial for informing antiplatelet therapy and lipid management in patients at high risk of haemorrhagic stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: