This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Spacer sequences of 42 and 127 bp, respectively, between the ISEcp1 insertion sequence and bla(CTX-M) have been observed in Klebsiella pneumoniae. However, it is not known whether different spacers upstream of bla(CTX-M) and a promoter within the 127 bp spacer influence cephalosporin resistance. Three recombinant plasmids with different spacers and with or without ISEcp1 were constructed to compare bla(CTX-M-3) expression and susceptibility to cephalosporins. Our experiment revealed enhanced bla(CTX-M-3) expression and a relatively high level resistance to cefotaxime and cefepime in recombinant plasmid IS42CTX-M-3, which contained ISEcp1 and the 42 bp spacer. A minor difference in bla(CTX-M-3) expression was observed in recombinants IS127CTX-M-3 and 127CTX-M-3, which contained a 127 bp spacer with or without ISEcp1, respectively. In conclusion, the promoter within ISEcp1 and a shorter spacer (42 bp but not 127 bp) between ISEcp1 and bla(CTX-M) are necessary for high-level bla(CTX-M-3) expression.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: