Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: Previous reports have profiled Australian psychiatry publishing in high-ranking international journals over the last two decades. An audit of selected high ranking and regional psychiatric journals was therefore undertaken to obtain a current profile of Australasian publishing. METHODS: Journals were selected on the basis of impact factors for the year 2000, with the top five regional, generalist and specialist journals being selected, and with publication numbers over a two-year period (1999-2000) compared with numbers from other major geographical regions. RESULTS: Of the 4573 papers identified in the 15 journals, Australasian authors contributed 269 to the regional journals (with two-thirds in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry), 47 to the generalist journals (with two-thirds in Psychological Medicine) and very few (23) to the specialist journals. Representation in the so-called "dominant four" international journals has increased since the 1986-1989 audit. When analysis was made of the "top nine" international journals, the Australasian representation rate was a low 1.8% and lower than most regions examined. CONCLUSIONS: If Australasian psychiatry is to advance its international presence, a greater representation rate in top-ranking international journals should be set as an objective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gordon Parker (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: