Why the study?
Does voluntary doubling of training miles induce reversed bradycardia and reduce running performance in healthy male marathon runners?
Does voluntary doubling of training miles induce reversed bradycardia and reduce running performance in healthy male marathon runners?
Training overstress in marathon runners can reverse training-induced bradycardia, driven by heightened sympathetic drive, which is associated with decreased running performance.
May signal overtraining risk in endurance athletes; hypothesis-generating before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: To elicit a criterion elevation (> 10%) in resting heart rate (HR) with training overstress, and subsequently test the hypothesis that such "reversed bradycardia" (RB) negatively affects running performance. DESIGN: Prospective before-and-after intervention with a comparison group. SETTING: General community. PARTICIPANTS: 21 healthy male marathon runners. INTERVENTION: Voluntary doubling of training miles on 14 consecutive days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Left ventricular (LV) function by echocardiography, HR, and plasma epinephrine (PE) at rest and during submaximal exercise, and 15 km road run performance. RESULTS: Two days after the training overstress, 12 runners met the criterion (RB group), showing an average elevation in resting HR of 16% (range: 11 to 23%). The RB group also exhibited hyperkinetic LV shortening (p < 0.05), elevated exercise HR (p < 0.001), increased PE at rest and during exercise (p < 0.05), and reduced 15 km performance (p < 0.05). The other nine runners who maintained a stable resting HR during the intervention showed no significant outcome changes. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to muscular overuse, heightened sympathetic drive likely contributed to the observed reversal of bradycardia. The development of this stress-related cardiac perturbation was associated with a decrement in running performance, confirming the hypothesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dressendorfer et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: