Why the study?
Does sulfinpyrazone 200 mg four times a day for 6 days inhibit platelet function and cyclooxygenase activity in healthy subjects?
Does sulfinpyrazone 200 mg four times a day for 6 days inhibit platelet function and cyclooxygenase activity in healthy subjects?
Sulfinpyrazone demonstrates weak potency and poor biochemical selectivity for platelet inhibition, which may explain its equivocal antithrombotic clinical benefits.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May explain sulfinpyrazone's equivocal antithrombotic effects; leaves open selective platelet inhibition with alternative dosing in patients.
The inhibitory effects of sulfinpyrazone are more marked ex vivo than in vitro, suggesting biotransformation to potentially active metabolites such as the sulfide and sulfone metabolites. As a platelet inhibitor, the sulfide metabolite is 10 times as potent as the parent and because of its long t½, the former may lead to cumulative inhibition of platelet function in vivo during chronic sulfinpyrazone dosing. In our study, healthy subjects received sulfinpyrazone, 200 mg four times a day, for 6 days. Plasma levels of the sulfide metabolite rose slightly from 2.1 ± 0.8 µg/ml 12 hr after the fourth dose to 2.8 ± 0.8 µg/ml 12 hr after the twenty-fourth dose. This was associated with increasing inhibition of ex vivo platelet aggregation induced by platelet-activating factor during the dosing period, but inhibition of arachidonic acid–induced aggregation did not increase cumulatively during dosing and collagen-induced aggregation was not inhibited. Inhibition of platelet aggregation was no longer evident 24 hr after the final dose of sulfinpyrazone. The effects of sulfinpyrazone on cyclooxygenase activity were assessed by measurement of thromboxane B2 production by thrombin-stimulated platelets ex vivo and urinary excretion of the major prostacyclin metabolite 2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGFlα. During sulfinpyrazone dosing, thromboxane formation and prostacyclin biosynthesis were correspondingly lowered 50% to 60%. The extent of this depression was of the same order on days 2 and 5 of dosing. After sulfinpyrazone, excretion of 2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGFlα recovered rapidly to levels before dosing, in contrast to the prolonged depression after chronic aspirin dosing. The weak potency and poor biochemical selectivity of sulfinpyrazone may have contributed to equivocal benefits in trials of its antithrombotic efficacy in vivo. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (1985) 37, 36–42; doi:10.1038/clpt.1985.8
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pedersen et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: