Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Off-pump CABG may reduce perioperative risks in select cases; leaves open long-term efficacy versus on-pump in broader populations.
Until the mid-1990s, coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) was performed with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass with the induction of ischemic cardiac arrest (on-pump). This surgical approach provided excellent exposure in a bloodless field with an arrested heart, allowing for precise performance of coronary anastomoses.1 However, there was concern about potentially deleterious effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. Such effects include the induction of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome by the bypass circuit with consequent multiorgan injury and the risk of stroke or other systemic embolic events caused by the cross-clamping of the aorta. For these reasons, some surgeons began performing CABG procedures . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frederick L. Grover (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: