Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We report a study describing the charm quark by a domain-wall fermion (DWF) in lattice quantum chromodynamics (QCD). Our study uses a quenched gauge ensemble with the DBW2 rectangle-improved gauge action at a lattice cutoff of a^-1~3 GeV. We calculate masses of heavy-light (charmed) and heavy-heavy (charmonium) mesons with spin-parity JP=0^∓ and 1^∓, leptonic decay constants of the charmed pseudoscalar mesons (D and Dₛ), and the D⁰-D̄⁰ mixing parameter. The charm quark mass is found to be mcMS̄(mc)=1.24(1)ₛₜₐₜ(18)syst GeV. The mass splittings in charmed-meson parity partners Δq,J=0 and Δq,J=1 are degenerate within statistical errors, in accordance with experiment, and they satisfy a relation Δq=ud,J>Δq=s,J, also consistent with experiment. Using our lattice calculation of the splitting between hc and χc1 and the experimental χc1 mass, we obtain a parity-odd axial-vector charmonium state m_hc=3533(11)ₛₜₐₜ(336)syst MeV, with a systematic error dominated by heavy quark discretization at order (amc)². However, in this regard, we emphasize significant discrepancies in the calculation of hyperfine splittings on the lattice. The leptonic decay constants of D and Dₛ mesons are found to be fD=232(7)ₛₜₐₜ(0+6-0)chiral(17)syst MeV and f_Dₛ/fD=1.05(2)ₛₜₐₜ(0+0-2)chiral(2)syst, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic due to chiral extrapolation, and the third error is a combination of other known systematics. The D⁰-D̄⁰ mixing bag parameter, which enters the ΔC=2 transition amplitude, is found to be BD(2 GeV)=0.845(24)ₛₜₐₜ(0+24-6)chiral(105)syst. All the above systematic errors include our estimates of quenching errors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: