Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cytogenetic data from the United States NICHD collaborative study of chorionic villus sampling (CVS) were used to evaluate the clinical significance of chorionic mosaicism. The 10,754 patients with normal cytogenetic results were compared with 108 patients (1.0 per cent) with placental mosaicism and 181 patients (1.6 per cent) with pseudo-mosaicism. Of the pregnancies intended to continue, the pregnancy loss rate was significantly greater in patients with placental mosaicism than in the cytogenetically normal cohort (8.6 vs. 3.4 per cent, p less than 0.05). However, there was no difference in the frequencies of abruptio placenta, preterm labour or delivery, small-for-gestational-age newborns, pregnancy-induced hypertension, or neonates with Apgar scores less than 7.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wapner et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: