Why the study?
The cardiometabolic index has evolved into a biomarker for metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease risk, but its relationship and possible interactions with sarcopenia required investigation.
Is an elevated cardiometabolic index associated with an increased risk of sarcopenia in U.S. adults?
Is an elevated cardiometabolic index associated with an increased risk of sarcopenia in U.S. adults?
Elevated cardiometabolic index is significantly associated with an increased risk of sarcopenia in U.S. adults, suggesting its potential utility as a clinical biomarker for sarcopenia risk surveillance.
May support CMI in sarcopenia risk surveillance; hypothesis-generating for prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: The cardiometabolic index (CMI), initially devised as a diagnostic tool for diabetes mellitus, has evolved into a composite biomarker for evaluating metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease risk. In order to shed light on any possible interactions between sarcopenia and CMI, this study will look at the relationship between the two. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from the 2011-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were analyzed to investigate the possible link between sarcopenia and CMI. Among 3,185 eligible participants, the weighted prevalence of sarcopenia was 7.84%. A significant positive association emerged between CMI and sarcopenia risk, with each unit increase in CMI was linked with a 12% greater risk of sarcopenia in the fully adjusted model (OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.01-1.26). Moreover, dose-response relationships were evident across CMI tertiles (P for trend < 0.05). Subgroup analyses and interaction tests indicated that the positive correlation between CMI and the risk of sarcopenia differs significantly across subgroups defined by education level, sedentary time and CVD status (all P for interaction < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate a robust association between elevated CMI levels and increased sarcopenia risk, suggesting CMI's potential utility as a clinical biomarker for sarcopenia risk surveillance. To confirm these results and demonstrate causality, more research is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: