This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The rapid growth of electric vehicles (EVs) has introduced new fire safety challenges for the built environment, particularly within reinforced concrete structures. Fires involving lithium-ion batteries are substantially different from conventional hydrocarbon-fuelled fires due to their rapid heat escalation, extended burning duration, and potential for re-ignition caused by thermal runaway. This study assesses the adequacy of existing fire design standards in addressing these emerging hazards, emphasising the spalling behaviour of concrete under EV induced fire exposure. The study found that concrete structures are highly vulnerable to spalling when exposed to EV fires, as the typical temperatures initiating concrete spalling are significantly lower than the extreme temperatures and re-ignition produced during an EV battery fire. Moreover, the evidence suggests that EV fires can sustain peak temperatures exceeding 1000 °C in a short period, which exceeds the assumptions underlying standard fire curves, such as ISO 834. A comparative assessment of the National Construction Code (NCC 2022) and standards (i.e., AS 1530.4, EN 1992-1-2) reveals that current design methodologies and fire-resistance ratings underestimate the severity and duration of EV fire conditions. This study also proposes code-aligned improvements and a performance-based evaluation framework that integrates empirical EV fire curves. The findings highlight a pressing need to re-examine fire design provisions and update thermal exposure assumptions to ensure that reinforced concrete infrastructure remains structurally safe and reliable as EV adoption increases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Navaratnam et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: