Why the study?
Does prolactin stimulate intracellular calcium mobilization in Chinese hamster ovary cells overexpressing functional prolactin receptors?
Does prolactin stimulate intracellular calcium mobilization in Chinese hamster ovary cells overexpressing functional prolactin receptors?
Prolactin induces delayed intracellular calcium mobilization in CHO cells expressing prolactin receptors, suggesting a signaling mechanism distinct from direct PIP2 hydrolysis.
Preclinical calcium responses in engineered cells warrant no clinical action; leaves open prolactin signaling relevance in human cardiomyocytes.
The mechanism of transduction of the PRL signal in target cells is poorly understood. We examined the effects of PRL on the intracellular free Ca2+ concentration in Chinese hamster ovary cells overexpressing functional PRL receptors. [Ca2+]i was determined by dual emission microspectrofluorimetry using indo-1 as the Ca2+ fluorescent probe. We demonstrate that at physiological concentrations (0.5-5 nM), PRL stimulates Ca2+ entry (type I) and/or induces a mobilization of calcium ions stored in intracellular compartments (type II). Two types of Ca2+ mobilization, distinguishable by their onset kinetics, were observed, a slow mobilization (type IIa; transition time to peak, approximately 10 sec) and a fast mobilization (type IIb; transition time to peak, < 2 sec). PRL responses were delayed (15-120 sec) compared to the well known activation by phosphatidylinositol 4,5 bisphosphate hydrolysis-coupled receptors. This suggests that inositol trisphosphate is not involved in PRL response or that phosphatidylinositol 4,5 bisphosphate hydrolysis is not directly coupled to the PRL receptor. The amplitude of the PRL-induced Ca2+ increases (300-1400 nM) would be sufficient to provoke several physiological responses, such as stimulation of secretion, cell proliferation, or gene activation. However, the relation between the increase in Ca2+ and activation of milk protein genes remains to be established.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vacher et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: