Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Editorial
This editorial debates the true prevalence of mitral valve prolapse as an underlying cause of infective endocarditis.
The September 1992 issue of theARCHIVEScontained a two-part study of the epidemiology of bacterial endocarditis in the Netherlands by van der Meer and associates.¹Although I enjoyed this interesting and thorough review, I must take an exception to one of the authors' conclusions. They found that mitral valve prolapse (MVP) was the underlying risk factor in only 8.3% of their patients with native valve endocarditis. They further state that "these findings contradict the conclusion of some authors that mitral valve prolapse has displaced rheumatic and congenital heart diseases as the major condition underlying endocarditis."¹They then reference two articles by my colleagues and I²⁻³and state that "the alleged increase in MVP as an underlying cause of endocarditis is probably a diagnostic bias resulting from an increased awareness of this condition." Of the two articles quoted, one²was an extensive review of the English-language
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alan L. Bisno (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: