Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study introduces a novel method to analyze how fillers disperse in bituminous binders. A custom-designed laboratory setup enables precise temperature control (140 °C) and mixing speeds (200, 800, 1500 rpm) for small-scale mixtures (5% filler) over 5, 15 and 30 min. To assess dispersion, microscopy-based visualization approach using optical microscopy (10× objective) and image analysis (ImageJ). Each particle is segmented and its projected area converted into an equivalent diameter, yielding a surface-fraction distribution (in logarithmic size bins). We evaluate the D 50 (Area50) position and the 50–100% range to detect coarse aggregates or over-shearing. The interest of the method is illustrated by comparing how limestone (CaCO 2 ) and quartz (SiO 2 ) fillers disperse in two different bitumens: naphthenic and paraffinic. Results indicate that quartz disperses more readily, quickly approaching a near-homogeneous state, whereas limestone requires higher shear and longer mixing times to approach the reference filler. Paraffinic bitumen shows a higher initial fine‑particle fraction; nonetheless, the naphthenic binder de‑agglomerates faster and ultimately matches, or slightly surpasses, the paraffinic dispersion. Mixing at 1500 rpm can fracture particles, skewing the size profile. The protocol delivers ± 1% repeatability across replicates, providing a robust tool for optimising mastic formulation and enhancing pavement durability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ouazri et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: