Why the study?
RDN reduces sympathetic nervous system hyperactivation, but data on its impact on pulmonary hemodynamics is lacking.
Does extended renal artery denervation alter systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics and cause artery wall lesions in normotensive pigs?
Does extended renal artery denervation alter systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics and cause artery wall lesions in normotensive pigs?
Extended renal artery denervation acutely lowers pulmonary artery pressure and systemic vascular resistance but is associated with artery wall lesions and thrombus formation.
Hypothesis-generating for pulmonary pressure effects; vascular lesions preclude human translation without further study.
Objectives. We sought to assess acute changes in systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics and microscopic artery lesions following extended renal artery denervation (RDN). Background. RDN has been proposed to reduce sympathetic nervous system hyperactivation. Although the effects of RDN on systemic circulation and overall sympathetic activity have been studied, data on the impact of RDN on pulmonary hemodynamics is lacking. Methods. The study comprised 13 normotensive Landrace pigs. After randomization, 7 animals were allocated to the group of bilateral RDN and 6 animals to the group of a sham procedure (SHAM). Hemodynamic measures, cannulation, and balloon-based occlusion of the renal arteries were performed in both groups. In the RDN group, radiofrequency ablation was performed in all available arteries and their segments. An autopsy study of the renal arteries was carried out in both groups. Results. The analysis was performed on 12 pigs (6 in either group) since pulmonary thromboembolism occurred in one case. A statistically significant drop in the mean diastolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) was detected in the RDN group when compared with the SHAM group (change by <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <a:mn>13.0</a:mn> <a:mo>±</a:mo> <a:mn>4.4</a:mn> </a:math> and <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"> <c:mn>10.0</c:mn> <c:mo>±</c:mo> <c:mn>3.0</c:mn> <c:mtext> </c:mtext> <c:mtext>mmHg</c:mtext> </c:math> , correspondingly; <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3"> <e:mi>P</e:mi> <e:mo>=</e:mo> <e:mn>0.04</e:mn> </e:math> ). In 5 out of 6 pigs in the RDN group, a significant decrease in systemic systolic blood pressure was found, when compared with baseline ( <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M4"> <g:mn>98.8</g:mn> <g:mo>±</g:mo> <g:mn>17.8</g:mn> </g:math> vs. <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M5"> <i:mn>90.2</i:mn> <i:mo>±</i:mo> <i:mn>12.6</i:mn> <i:mtext> </i:mtext> <i:mtext>mmHg</i:mtext> </i:math> , <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M6"> <k:mi>P</k:mi> <k:mo>=</k:mo> <k:mn>0.04</k:mn> </k:math> ), and a lower mean pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) ( <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M7"> <m:mn>291.0</m:mn> <m:mo>±</m:mo> <m:mn>77.4</m:mn> </m:math> vs. <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M8"> <o:mn>228.5</o:mn> <o:mo>±</o:mo> <o:mn>63.8</o:mn> <o:mtext> </o:mtext> <o:mtext>dyn</o:mtext> <o:mo>∗</o:mo> <o:mi mathvariant="normal">sec</o:mi> <o:mo>∗</o:mo> <o:mtext>c</o:mtext> <o:msup> <o:mrow> <o:mtext>m</o:mtext> </o:mrow> <o:mrow> <o:mo>−</o:mo> <o:mn>5</o:mn> </o:mrow> </o:msup> </o:math> , <r:math xmlns:r="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M9"> <r:mi>P</r:mi> <r:mo>=</r:mo> <r:mn>0.03</r:mn> </r:math> ) after ablation was found. Artery dissections were found in both groups, with prevalence in animals after RDN. Conclusions. Extensive RDN leads to a rapid and significant decrease in PAP. In the majority of cases, RDN is associated with an acute lowering of systolic blood pressure and PVR. Extended RDN is associated with artery wall lesions and thrombus formation underdiagnosed by angiography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vakhrushev et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: