Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The transport of magnetic nanoparticles in aquatic environments was studied using maghemite (gamma-Fe(2)O(3)) and gamma-Fe(2)O(3) based (Fe(x)Ni(1-x))(y)O(z) nanoparticles as a function of pH and particle iron content that induced a different magnetic property. Transport studies were conducted in packed bed columns (1 mM KCl, pH 6 and 9) and stability studies were done by dynamic light scattering and sedimentation measurements. Results showed that the stability and transport of these magnetic nanoparticles were influenced by a combination of electrostatic and magnetic interactions. Transport results showed that the less magnetic nanoparticles (possessing higher nickel content) eluted to a greater extent than the more magnetic particles at both pH 6 and 9. The stability in water at both pH 6 and 9 also increased, as nickel content in particles increased suggesting that magnetic interactions enhance aggregation. The nanoparticles eluted to a greater extent at pH 9, at which they were more negatively charged, than at pH 6. Complementary experiments were conducted with alpha-Fe(2)O(3), a nonmagnetic, highly negatively charged nanoparticle which was transported more than the other magnetic particles. The majority of particles were retained at the column inlet (1-2 cm) for all transport experiments, with the greatest amount of retention being that of the magnetic nanoparticles (gamma-Fe(2)O(3)), indicating that magnetically induced aggregation and subsequent straining resulted in greater retention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: