Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Kolmogorov's classic theory for turbulence assumed an independence between velocity increments and the value for the velocity itself. However, recent work has called this assumption in to question, which has implications for the structure of atmospheric, oceanic and fluvial flows. Here we propose a conceptually simple analytical framework for studying velocity‐intermittency coupling that is similar in essence to the popular quadrant analysis method for studying near‐wall flows. However, we study the dominant (longitudinal) velocity component along with a measure of the roughness of the signal, given mathematically by its series of Hölder exponents. Thus, we permit a possible dependence between velocity and intermittency. We compare boundary layer data obtained in a wind tunnel to turbulent jets and wake flows. These flow classes all have distinct characteristics, which cause them to be readily distinguished using our technique and the results are robust to changes in flow Reynolds numbers. Classification of environmental flows is then possible based on their similarities to the idealized flow classes and we demonstrate this using laboratory data for flow in a parallel‐channel confluence. Our results have clear implications for sediment transport in a range of geophysical applications as they suggest that the recently proposed impulse‐based methods for studying bed load transport are particularly relevant in domains such as gravel bed river flows where the boundary layer is disrupted and wake interactions predominate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keylock et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: