Why the study?
The relationship between serial longitudinal hsCRP assessment and long-term major cardiovascular events in patients with chronic atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease had not been explored.
Does longitudinal follow-up hsCRP level associate with 30-month MACE in optimally-treated patients with high-risk vascular disease?
Does longitudinal follow-up hsCRP level associate with 30-month MACE in optimally-treated patients with high-risk vascular disease?
Longitudinal follow-up hsCRP is significantly associated with an increased risk of long-term MACE and mortality in optimally-treated patients with high-risk vascular disease, suggesting it is a marker of residual cardiovascular risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports hsCRP as residual risk marker in high-risk vascular disease; leaves open whether targeting it improves outcomes.
Background High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) predicts major cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with chronic atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The relationship between serial longitudinal hsCRP assessment and long-term MACE has not been explored. Purpose We tested the hypothesis that longitudinal follow-up hsCRP levels (repeated measures over time) would associate with 30-month MACE (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, coronary revascularization or hospitalization for unstable angina) rates. Methods We performed a post-hoc analysis of the ACCELERATE trial of optimally-treated patients with high-risk vascular disease and evaluated data from patients with available baseline and at least one follow-up hsCRP level measured at 3, 12, and 24 months. Those with a MACE event occurring before 3 months were omitted. Using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, we determined the association of longitudinal follow-up hsCRP levels with MACE, its components, and all-cause mortality at 30-months, adjusting for age, race, sex, region, smoking status, body mass index, diabetes, baseline hsCRP, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, statin use, and treatment group. Results Among 8,563 patients, mean age was 64.6±9.3 years and 22.2% were women. Median baseline hsCRP was 1.49 (0.74, 3.3) mg/L. Median time-weighted average follow-up hsCRP was 1.80 (0.88, 3.9) mg/L and mean time-weighted average follow-up LDL-C was 71.7±28.0 mg/dL. At 30 months, there was a significant stepwise relationship between cumulative MACE and increasing tertiles of last prior hsCRP value before an event or censoring (KM estimates for tertiles 1–3, respectively: 8.9 vs. 12.4 vs. 15.6%, p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, higher longitudinal follow-up hsCRP levels were independently associated with MACE [HR (95% CI) per SD: 1.19 (1.10, 1.29), p<0.001], all-cause death [1.66 (1.48, 1.86), p<0.001], cardiovascular death [1.39 (1.19, 1.62), p<0.001], myocardial infarction [1.28 (1.12, 1.46), p<0.001], stroke [1.32 (1.08, 1.62), p=0.007], and coronary revascularization [1.12 (1.01, 1.24), p=0.03], but not with hospitalization for unstable angina [0.94 (0.77, 1.14), p=0.51]. Longitudinal follow-up hsCRP was significantly associated with MACE in patients with baseline hsCRP <2mg/L [1.16 (1.04, 1.30), p=0.008] and ≥2mg/L [1.25 (1.12, 1.40), p<0.001]. Conclusions In the setting of established medical therapies, longitudinal follow-up hsCRP is significantly associated with an increased risk of long-term MACE, myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, coronary revascularization, and all-cause death. Longitudinal follow-up hsCRP may thus represent a novel marker of residual cardiovascular risk, supporting further work exploring the potential diagnostic and therapeutic implications of these findings. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Iryna Dykun was supported by the German Research Foundation
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dykun et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: