Why the study?
Does P2Y12 promoter hypomethylation predict higher platelet reactivity and recurrence of ischemic events in Chinese patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease?
Does P2Y12 promoter hypomethylation predict higher platelet reactivity and recurrence of ischemic events in Chinese patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease?
Hypomethylation of the P2Y12 promoter may serve as a novel molecular biomarker to identify patients at high risk for clopidogrel resistance and recurrent ischemic events.
May flag higher ischemic risk on clopidogrel; hypothesis-generating for epigenetic biomarkers, needs prospective validation.
The primary mechanism of clopidogrel resistance is still unclear. We aimed to investigate whether the methylation status of the P2Y12 promoter has effects on platelet function and clinical ischemic events. Patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease were enrolled into our study. Venous blood samples were drawn for thrombelastograpy (TEG) and active metabolite assay. Patients were divided into a case- or control-group based on the occurrence of ischemic events during a one year follow-up. Two TEG parameters between the case and control groups were statistically significant [ADP inhibition rate (ADP%): P = 0.018; ADP-induced platelet-fibrin clot strength (MA ADP ): P = 0.030]. The concentrations of clopidogrel active metabolite had no significant difference ( P = 0.281). Sixteen CpG dinucleotides on P2Y12 promoter were tested. Three CpG sites (CpG11 and CpG12 + 13) showed lower methylation status, which correlated with a strong association with increased risk of clinical events. Changes of MA ADP and ADP% were also associated with methylation levels of CpG 11 and CpG 12 + 13. Hypomethylation of the P2Y12 promoter is associated with a higher platelet reactivity and increased risk of ischemic events in our patients. Methylation analysis of peripheral blood samples might be a novel molecular marker to help early identification of patients at high risk for clinical ischemic events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: