Why the study?
Do minimally invasive interventions improve outcomes compared to surgical treatment in patients with interventricular septum rupture during acute myocardial infarction?
Do minimally invasive interventions improve outcomes compared to surgical treatment in patients with interventricular septum rupture during acute myocardial infarction?
This review discusses minimally invasive interventions as an alternative to open surgical treatment for interventricular septum rupture in acute myocardial infarction.
The rupture of the interventricular septum (ivs) remains a severe complication of acute myocardial infarction. In this article, we discuss optimal treatment tactics for patients with internal heart ruptures in acute myocardial infarction. We consider minimally invasive interventions in the optimally early periods of acute myocardial infarction as an alternative to surgical treatment using artificial circulation. It remains urgent to improve measures preventing complications in acute myocardial infarction, as well as its early diagnosis and the specifics of managing such patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuzmina et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: