Key result
Coexistent CAD links to major adverse limb events and death in chronic limb-threatening ischemia.
Why the study?
Does coexistent coronary artery disease impact the risk of major adverse limb events or death in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia undergoing lower-extremity revascularization?
RCT
Does coexistent coronary artery disease impact the risk of major adverse limb events or death in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia undergoing lower-extremity revascularization?
Reveals the influence of coronary artery disease on limb and cardiovascular outcomes in chronic limb-threatening ischemia, highlighting the risk of widespread atherosclerosis.
The most severe form of peripheral artery disease (PAD), chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), is marked by rest pain, nonhealing ulcers, or gangrene. PAD, a manifestation of atherosclerosis, significantly increases the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and death. More than half of patients with less severe PAD also have coexistent coronary artery disease (CAD). The BEST-CLI trial (Best Endovascular vs Best Surgical Therapy in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia; URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02060630) tested the optimal method of infrainguinal revascularization. The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse limb events (MALEs) or death from any cause. MACEs, MALEs, and total death were secondary outcomes. We examined the effect of CAD on these outcomes in BEST-CLI participants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beckman et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Coronary artery disease vs. No coronary artery disease was evaluated on Composite of major adverse limb events (MALEs) or death from any cause. The abstract outlines a secondary analysis examining the impact of coronary artery disease on outcomes in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia, but provides no quantitative results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: