Why the study?
The validity of noninvasive continuous blood pressure estimation using two different types of peripheral pulse waves required evaluation.
Can the phase difference of two peripheral pulse waves accurately estimate continuous blood pressure noninvasively?
Can the phase difference of two peripheral pulse waves accurately estimate continuous blood pressure noninvasively?
Phase difference between two peripheral pulse waves shows promise for noninvasive, continuous blood pressure monitoring, though it is confounded by arterial smooth muscle state.
May support noninvasive continuous BP estimation; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
In this article, we discuss the validity of noninvasive continuous blood pressure estimation with two different types of peripheral pulse waves. Artery-blocking experiment shows that phase difference of two pulse waves at the same location is well related with blood pressure and blood flow fluctuation. Exercise-recovery experiment resulting from 16 subjects shows that phase difference varies with blood pressure with the correlation from 0.63 to 0.88 when blood pressure changes rapidly. Simulations based on a classic hemodynamic model verify the relationship between phase difference and blood pressure. However, phase difference is strongly correlated with smooth muscle state of the arterial wall as well. If smooth muscle information can be obtained by further study, phase difference can act as a promising approach to portable and wearable device for real-time blood pressure monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: