Study estimates changes in systolic blood pressure, suggesting improved non-invasive monitoring techniques.
OBJECTIVE: To date, continuous cuff-based non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitoring remains limited. NIBP provides intermittent readings for systolic blood pressure (SBP) but misses short-term SBP fluctuations. Newly developed approaches that use the photoplethysmogram (PPG) for estimating SBP generalize poorly without calibration due to subject-specific vascular properties. To overcome these limitations, we reformulate PPG-based SBP estimation as estimating the change in SBP (ΔSBP) between two time points. Methods. We implemented a learning-based approach that compares pairs of 20-second PPG segments to estimate ΔSBP. Our approach was developed and evaluated on 12,279 patients, with a held-out test set comprising 2,457 patients, collected from the VitalDB and MIMIC-III datasets. Root mean squared error (RMSE), Pearson correlation coefficient (r), and Cohen's kappa (κ) were used for performance quantification. Results. On the held-out test sets, our approach achieved RMSE of 14.53/11.37 mmHg, r of 0.79/0.65, and κ of 0.57/0.44 for PPG-based ΔSBP (VitalDB/MIMIC-III), across segment pairs separated by 1 min to multiple hours. Errors occurred primarily in cases where morphological analyses identified only minor changes in the waveform despite large ΔSBP values, especially in MIMIC-III. Model predictions correlated more strongly with SBP than with heart rate, indicating reliance on pulse wave morphology. Long-term analysis demonstrated stable ΔSBP estimation over 28 hours. Conclusion. Our results support the potential of morphology-based relative blood pressure estimation using PPG. The introduced approach could complement cuff-based monitoring by filling gaps between intermittent measurements, particularly during sleep, where cuff inflations are disruptive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scherpf et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: