Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cytochrome c (cyt c ) and cytochrome f (cyt f ) molecular recognition characters and their structural changes due to complex formation with negatively charged aspartic acid peptides (Aspptd's) have been studied. Changes in the absorption spectrum of cyt c in the Soret region were detected when Aspptd's, up to penta -Asp, were added to the cyt c solution. These changes were the same as those observed when cyt c interacted with plastocyanin (PC), indicating that Aspptd's interacted with cyt c in the same way as PC. Conformational changes of cyt c due to interaction with Aspptd's observed by resonance Raman spectroscopy were similar to those reported for cyt c when bound with its native partner, cytochrome c oxidase. Electrochemical measurements showed that the redox potential of cyt c and cyt f shifted to lower potentials by 7−20 mV upon Aspptd binding, showing the enhancement in the electron donor ability of both cyt c and cyt f upon complex formation with Aspptd. The changes in the absorption spectrum and redox potential increased with the length and concentration of Aspptd. The observed structural and redox changes of cyt c and cyt f are attributed to adduct formations with Aspptd's by electrostatic interactions and suggest that similar changes would occur for cyt c and cyt f when interacting with proteins. Aspptd's, tetra - and penta -aspartic acid, served as competitive inhibitors of the electron transfer from cyt c or cyt f to PC, which was ascribable to the same adduct formation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hirota et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: