Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The effects of storage at 0,4,10, and 22°C for 0,1,3,5, and 9 d on the quality of yellowfin tuna fillets as determined by microbiological assessment, development of some biogenic amines, and sensory analysis were studied. Tuna fillets stored at 22 °C for 3 d, 10 °C for 5 d, and 4 °C for 9 d were rated unacceptable for consumption. Those stored at 22 °C for 3 d had total aerobic bacterial count of > 8 log 10 CFU/g, a histamine‐producing bacterial population of 7 log 10 CFU/g, and 832 ppm of histamine, 35.8 ppm of putrescine, and 147 ppm of cadaverine. A comparison of the capillary electrophoresis, AOAC fluorometric method, and gas chromatography showed a very good correlation (r 2 > 0.99) among these 3 methods for histamine quantitation in tuna samples. Morganella morganii, Enterobacter agglomerans, Enterobacter intermedium, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Proteins vulgaris , and Serratia liquefaciens were the decarboxylase‐positive bacterial species isolated by using the Niven's medium and identified during storage, which were responsible for histamine production in test tuna fillets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Du et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: