Key result
A Medium-Range Theory for Nursing in Cardiovascular Rehabilitation was developed, presenting eleven concepts and theoretical propositions to guide future testing and nursing care.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to describe a medium-range nursing theory for the cardiovascular rehabilitation process.
This study provides a theoretical framework based on Roy's Adaptation Model to guide nursing care and future research in cardiovascular rehabilitation.
May inform nursing cardiovascular rehabilitation; leaves open empirical testing of its propositions.
OBJECTIVES: to describe a medium-range nursing theory for the cardiovascular rehabilitation process. METHODS: theoretical development study, addressing the elaboration of medium-range theory, based on Roy's Adaptation Model, which combined theoretical deduction with induction strategies, based on literature review and concept analysis. RESULTS: the Medium-Range Theory for Nursing in Cardiovascular Rehabilitation presents eleven concepts and respective definitions, organized in relationships that represent elements, through modeling and image representation. Theoretical assumptions and propositions are presented. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: the theory presented aims to contribute to the description of the cardiovascular rehabilitation process from the perspective of the adaptation of the person, family and groups, as well as to impact the nursing care implemented to patients in the process. The procedures advanced from conceptualization to operationalization, through the production of theoretical propositions that will guide future theoretical testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farias et al. (2021) studied Cardiovascular rehabilitation. Medium-Range Theory for Nursing in Cardiovascular Rehabilitation was evaluated. A Medium-Range Theory for Nursing in Cardiovascular Rehabilitation was developed, presenting eleven concepts and theoretical propositions to guide future testing and nursing care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: