Key result
Need for redo mitral valve surgery was associated with preoperative pulmonary hypertension ≥50 mmHg (p=0.02), transmitral gradient >5 mmHg (p=0.001), LVEF ≤45% (p=0.05), and ≥moderate MR at discharge.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to identify echocardiographic and surgical risk factors for failure after mitral valve repair.
What echocardiographic and surgical risk factors predict the need for redo mitral valve surgery after primary repair?
Case-Control (n=215)
No
What echocardiographic and surgical risk factors predict the need for redo mitral valve surgery after primary repair?
Preoperative pulmonary hypertension, elevated transmitral gradient, reduced LVEF, and residual moderate or greater MR at discharge are significant predictors of mitral valve repair failure requiring redo surgery.
These factors may flag higher-risk mitral repair patients for closer surveillance; leaves open whether risk modification reduces redo rates.
Objective: To identify echocardiographic and surgical risk factors for failure after mitral valve repair. Methods: We identified a total of 77 consecutive patients from our institutional mitral valve surgery database who required redo mitral valve surgery due to recurrence of mitral regurgitation after primary mitral valve repair. A control group of 138 patients who had a stable echocardiographic long-term result was included based on propensity score matching. Systematic analysis of echocardiographic parameters was performed before primary surgery; after mitral valve repair and prior to redo surgery. Risk factor analysis was performed using multivariate Cox regression model. Results: Redo surgery was associated with the presence of pulmonary hypertension ≥ 50 mmHg (p = 0.02), a mean transmitral gradient > 5 mmHg (p = 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45% (p = 0.05) before surgery and mitral regurgitation ≥moderate at time of discharge (p = 0.002) in the whole cohort. Patients with functional mitral valve regurgitation had a higher tendency to undergo redo surgery if preoperative left ventricular end-diastolic diameter exceeded 65 mm (p = 0.043) and if postoperative tenting height exceeded 6 mm (p = 0.018). Low ejection fraction was not significantly associated with the need for redo mitral valve surgery in the functional subgroup. Conclusions: Recurrent mitral regurgitation is still a valuable problem and is associated with relevant perioperative mortality. Patients with severe mitral regurgitation should undergo early mitral valve repair surgery as long as systolic pulmonary artery pressure is low, left ventricular ejection fraction is preserved, and LVEED is deceeds 65 mm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gasser et al. (2019) conducted a case-control in Recurrent mitral regurgitation (n=215). Echocardiographic and surgical risk factors vs. Absence of risk factors was evaluated on Redo mitral valve surgery due to recurrence of mitral regurgitation. Need for redo mitral valve surgery was associated with preoperative pulmonary hypertension ≥50 mmHg (p=0.02), transmitral gradient >5 mmHg (p=0.001), LVEF ≤45% (p=0.05), and ≥moderate MR at discharge.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: