Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Per cent of predicted as the limit of normal in pulmonary function testing: a statistically valid approach It has been traditional in pulmonary function testing to set the limits of normal as the predicted -4-20%. Since most pulmonary function tests, and all spirometric tests, are abnormal only when below predicted, the rule of thumb for the limit of normal becomes 80% of predicted. How this
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sobol et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: