Duodenal compliance differs between phase I and phase II of the MMC, likely due to increased smooth muscle tone during phase I.
Phase-specific duodenal compliance may influence motility testing interpretation; leaves open need for phase-adjusted protocols in future studies.
We used a new method, impedance planimetry, to look at variations in compliance, tone, and distension-induced peristaltic activity during phase I and phase II of the migrating myoelectric complex (MMC) in the human duodenum. A balloon was inflated stepwise with pressures up to 30 cmH2O in the duodenum, while the pressure and balloon cross-sectional area (CSA) were measured simultaneously. The biomechanical wall parameters were calculated from these measurements. Nine duodenal phase IIIs were recorded in six subjects. A balloon pressure of 20 cmH2O induced a smaller CSA in early phase I [266 (236-324) mm2] than in late phase II [385 (276-474) mm2] (P < 0.05). Balloon distensions elicited no contractions in phase I, whereas they increased contractile activity 60% (P < 0.05) proximal to the balloon and 4% distal to the balloon in late phase II. Step distensions in phase I with balloon pressures between 10 and 30 cmH2O increased the CSA from 40 (30-81) to 645 (603-704) mm2. It increased circumferential wall tension from 35 (28-63) to 429 (402-466) mm x cmH2O and the pressure elastic modulus from 9.7 (9.0-14.7) to 33.8 (27.6-33.8) cmH2O, respectively. Thus compliance differs from phase I to phase II. This is most likely caused by increased smooth muscle tone during phase I. Duodenal wall stiffness increases with the balloon pressure applied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gregersen et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: