Key result
Patients with coronary heart disease who developed atrial fibrillation had significantly higher multi-inflammatory index levels (10.02 vs 4.79), and a LightGBM model predicted AF with an AUC of 0.757.
Why the study?
Chronic inflammation plays a key role linking coronary heart disease to atrial fibrillation, but the predictive value of the multi-inflammatory index in this setting needed investigation.
Does the multi-inflammatory index predict atrial fibrillation risk in patients with coronary heart disease?
Observational (n=1,392)
No
Does the multi-inflammatory index predict atrial fibrillation risk in patients with coronary heart disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 10.02% vs 4.79%
p-value: p=<0.001
The multi-inflammatory index, combined with machine learning models like LightGBM, provides a strong predictive tool for identifying atrial fibrillation risk in patients with coronary heart disease.
Background: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, with atrial fibrillation (AF) being a common complication. Chronic inflammatory responses play a significant role in the relationship between coronary artery disease and AF. This study aims to investigate the value of the multi-inflammatory index (MII) in predicting the occurrence of atrial fibrillation in patients with coronary heart disease. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who visited our hospital from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2023, including a total of 1392 patients. Clinical data and laboratory results were collected. Feature selection was performed using the Boruta algorithm. Five machine learning models were constructed: Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Elastic Net, Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), and Multilayer Perceptron. Model performance was evaluated using five-fold cross-validation. SHAP values were utilized to analyze feature importance and model interpretability. Results: The study included 1302 patients without AF and 90 patients with AF. Patients with AF had significantly higher MII compared to those without AF (10.02 vs 4.79). Thirteen variables most related to AF occurrence were selected using the Boruta algorithm. The LightGBM model outperformed others, showing the highest accuracy and calibration in both training and test sets. In the training set, LightGBM achieved an AUC of 0.958, accuracy of 0.851, and sensitivity of 0.943, while in the testing set, it achieved an AUC of 0.757 and accuracy of 0.821. SHAP analysis indicated that age, heart rate, and MII were the primary predictors of AF occurrence. Conclusion: The LightGBM model demonstrated adequate sensitivity and accuracy. The multi-inflammatory index plays a crucial role in predicting atrial fibrillation in patients with coronary heart disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hou et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Coronary heart disease (n=1,392). Multi-inflammatory index (MII) vs. Patients without atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Multi-inflammatory index (MII) levels in patients with vs without atrial fibrillation (p=<0.001). Patients with coronary heart disease who developed atrial fibrillation had significantly higher multi-inflammatory index levels (10.02 vs 4.79), and a LightGBM model predicted AF with an AUC of 0.757.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: