Key result
Reducing heart rate by approximately 15% with ivabradine or metoprolol limited carotid artery stiffening, while ivabradine and physical training maintained or improved cerebral endothelial function and compliance.
Why the study?
Does heart rate reduction or physical training improve arterial compliance and endothelial function in dyslipidemic atherosclerotic mice?
Does heart rate reduction or physical training improve arterial compliance and endothelial function in dyslipidemic atherosclerotic mice?
p-value: p=<0.05
Heart rate reduction limits carotid artery stiffening in dyslipidemic mice, while cerebrovascular compliance is primarily regulated by endothelial function.
Heart rate reduction may limit carotid stiffening in atherosclerotic mice; leaves open whether endothelial modulation improves cerebral compliance in patients.
The cardiac cycle imposes a mechanical stress that dilates elastic carotid arteries, while shear stress largely contributes to the endothelium-dependent dilation of downstream cerebral arteries. In the presence of dyslipidemia, carotid arteries stiffen while the endothelial function declines. We reasoned that stiffening of carotid arteries would be prevented by reducing resting heart rate (HR), while improving the endothelial function would regulate cerebral artery compliance and function. Thus we treated or not 3-mo-old male atherosclerotic mice (ATX; LDLr(-/-):hApoB(+/+)) for 3 mo with the sinoatrial pacemaker current inhibitor ivabradine (IVA), the β-blocker metoprolol (METO), or subjected mice to voluntary physical training (PT). Arterial (carotid and cerebral artery) compliance and endothelium-dependent flow-mediated cerebral dilation were measured in isolated pressurized arteries. IVA and METO similarly reduced (P < 0.05) 24-h HR by ≈15%, while PT had no impact. As expected, carotid artery stiffness increased (P < 0.05) in ATX mice compared with wild-type mice, while cerebral artery stiffness decreased (P < 0.05); this paradoxical increase in cerebrovascular compliance was associated with endothelial dysfunction and an augmented metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) activity (P < 0.05), without changing the lipid composition of the wall. Reducing HR (IVA and METO) limited carotid artery stiffening, but plaque progression was prevented by IVA only. In contrast, IVA maintained and PT improved cerebral endothelial nitric oxide synthase-dependent flow-mediated dilation and wall compliance, and both interventions reduced MMP-9 activity (P < 0.05); METO worsened endothelial dysfunction and compliance and did not reduce MMP-9 activity. In conclusion, HR-dependent mechanical stress contributes to carotid artery wall stiffening in severely dyslipidemic mice while cerebrovascular compliance is mostly regulated by the endothelium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bolduc et al. (2011) studied Dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis. Ivabradine, Metoprolol, or Physical Training vs. Untreated sedentary atherosclerotic mice was evaluated on Carotid and cerebral artery compliance and endothelium-dependent flow-mediated cerebral dilation (p=<0.05). Reducing heart rate by approximately 15% with ivabradine or metoprolol limited carotid artery stiffening, while ivabradine and physical training maintained or improved cerebral endothelial function and compliance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: