Key result
A rotavirus immunization programme in the UK would result in a net cost of £42.29 per eligible child from a health sector perspective, but could provide net savings from a societal perspective.
Why the study?
Is a universal rotavirus vaccination programme cost-effective compared to no programme in UK infants?
Is a universal rotavirus vaccination programme cost-effective compared to no programme in UK infants?
Effect estimate: £42.29 net cost
A universal rotavirus vaccination program in the UK is cost-saving from a societal perspective but incurs significant additional costs from a health sector perspective.
May support societal-perspective inclusion in UK rotavirus policy; leaves open health-sector affordability and requires further modeling.
Rotavirus is the most common cause of gastroenteritis in children aged <5 years old, two new vaccines have recently been developed which can prevent associated morbidity and mortality. While apparently safe and efficacious, it is also important to establish whether rotavirus immunization is cost effective. A decision analytical model which employs data from a review of published evidence is used to determine the cost effectiveness of a rotavirus vaccine. The results suggest that some of the health sector costs, and all of the societal costs, of rotavirus gastroenteritis in children can be avoided by an immunization programme. The additional cost to the health sector may be considered worthwhile if there is a sufficient improvement in the quality-of-life of children and parents affected by gastroenteritis; this study did not find any evidence of research which has measured the utility gains from vaccination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lorgelly et al. (2007) studied Rotavirus gastroenteritis (n=632,000). Rotavirus immunization programme vs. No vaccination programme was evaluated on Net cost per eligible child (health sector perspective) (£42.29 net cost). A rotavirus immunization programme in the UK would result in a net cost of £42.29 per eligible child from a health sector perspective, but could provide net savings from a societal perspective.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: