Key result
Autologous bone marrow stem cell transplantation demonstrates safety and efficacy for cardiac repair in patients with acute myocardial infarction or chronic ischemic heart disease.
This review summarizes the biological background, methodology, and clinical results of stem cell therapy for acute myocardial infarction and chronic ischemic heart disease.
Supports stem cell therapy research in ischemic heart disease; should not yet change practice pending randomized trials.
Chronic ischemic heart disease remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although revascularisation strategies and pharmaceutical therapy are able to delay ventricular remodelling, until today no therapeutic strategy is available that might prevent or even reverse this process of remodelling and consequent ventricular failure. In the recent past, experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated the capacity of bone marrow stem cells in cardiac repair and regeneration of compromised heart muscle. Several clinical trials showed the safety and efficacy of autologous bone marrow stem cell transplantation in the patients with acute myocardial infarction or chronic ischemic heart disease. Today the therapeutic strategy of cell administration during cardiac surgery or coronary artery intervention is entering the clinical practice. In the following Review we will highlight biological as well as methodological backgrounds, indications and clinical results of cardiac stem cell therapy for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction and chronic ischemic heart disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Donndorf et al. (2013) conducted a review in Acute myocardial infarction and chronic ischemic heart disease. Autologous bone marrow stem cell transplantation was evaluated. Autologous bone marrow stem cell transplantation demonstrates safety and efficacy for cardiac repair in patients with acute myocardial infarction or chronic ischemic heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: