Preclinical study demonstrates near-complete tumor suppression in a rat polyposis model, suggesting low-dose drug regimens can effectively remodel the immune niche.
A previously reported clinical trial in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients treated with erlotinib plus sulindac (ERL + SUL) highlighted immune response/interferon‐γ signaling as a key pathway. In this study, we combine intermittent low‐dose ERL ± SUL treatment in the polyposis in rat colon (Pirc) model with mechanistic studies on tumor‐associated immune modulation. At clinically relevant doses, short‐term (16 weeks) and long‐term (46 weeks) ERL ± SUL administration results in near‐complete tumor suppression in Pirc colon and duodenum ( p < 0.0001). We identify a low‐dose threshold for significant antitumor activity in Pirc rats given SUL at 125 ppm in the diet plus ERL at 5 mg/kg body weight via twice‐weekly oral gavage (SUL125 + ERL5 × 2). Longitudinal analyses show diminished expression of MHC class I and II genes in polyps larger than Grade 5, a novel finding in the Pirc model. Treatment with ERL ± SUL upregulates the corresponding MHC and immune‐associated factors in a subset of Pirc colon polyps , Pirc tumor cell lines, murine colon carcinoma cells, and FAP patient‐derived organoids, with Nlrc5 playing a critical role in this effect. Imaging mass cytometry reveals that SUL125 + ERL5 × 2 increases tumor‐associated Cd4 + T cells by ~2.6‐fold ( p < 0.05), with no apparent effect on Cd8 + T cells. The treatment also increases tumor‐associated Cd68 + cells ( p < 0.05) and decreases Foxp3 + ( p < 0.01) and Arg1 + ( p < 0.05) cells. Thus, intermittent low‐dose ERL + SUL treatment enhances tumor‐associated MHC expression and remodels the immune cell niche toward a more permissive “helper” immune microenvironment. We conclude that early immune‐interception strategies targeting interferon‐γ signaling may benefit FAP patients at drug doses below the clinical standard of care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tripathi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: