Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary Knowing when to change dulled bits can significantly reduce costs, which can be particularly important in high-cost environments. However, current techniques are based more on speculation and hope rather than science. The concept developed to dramatically improve this inefficient decision process involved measuring the mechanical energy input at the drill rig floor, calculating the drilling specific energy (SE), checking the current formation type with real-time downhole gamma ray (GR) readings, comparing the SE with the benchmark new-bit SE, and then using these values to assess the bit's "dull" state. This method has been proven to work in synthetic-based mud systems in which balling does not mask the bit's dull condition. It was imperative that the operator proved that this process worked in water-based drilling fluids that had replaced earlier synthetic muds because of environmental concerns, cost, and improved performance in water-based mud (WBM). Recently, the operator established that this process worked in water-based mud systems treated with antiballing chemicals. The case studies in which this methodology was developed are presented and discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Waughman et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: