By combining grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations with adsorption theory, we perform a computational study on adsorption of CH 4 and CO 2 gases and purification of CO 2 from the CH 4 −CO 2 and N 2 −CO 2 binary mixtures by the C 60 intercalated graphite. The adsorption isotherms, isosteric heats and snapshots of pure gases have been examined extensively. It is found that the maximum excess uptakes at 298 K are relatively low, only giving 4.04 and 4.96 mmol/g for CH 4 and CO 2, respectively, due to a low porosity of 0.45 and a large crystal density of 1.57 g/cm 3 of this material. It indicates that the pristine material is not suitable for gas storage. However, this material provides excellent selectivity for CO 2, and the selectivity at ambient condition can reach 8 and 50 for the CH 4 −CO 2 and N 2 −CO 2 mixture, respectively. Furthermore, the selectivity of CO 2 is almost independent of the bulk gas composition for P > 0.1 MPa. The dual-site Langmuir−Freundlich (DSLF) equation is used to fit the adsorption isotherms of pure gases from GCMC simulations, and the corresponding parameters are obtained. Moreover, we further predicted the adsorption behavior of binary mixtures by the DSLF-based ideal adsorption solution theory (IAST). Although the IAST theory slightly overestimates the selectivity, compared to GCMC results, the uptakes and selectivity from both methods are basically consistent. To improve the adsorption capacities, we further tailor the structural parameter “ g ” of the C 60 intercalated graphite by GCMC simulations. For equimolar gas composition, at the condition of g = 1.4 nm and 6 MPa, the CO 2 uptakes could be raised by 200%, approaching 12 mmol/g for both mixtures, without loss of the selectivity for CO 2 . In summary, this work demonstrates that the C 60 intercalated graphite is an excellent material for CO 2 purification, especially for N 2 −CO 2 system at room temperature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: