Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AI-generated art elicits two characteristic failures of aesthetic judgment: wholesale dismissal rooted in bias, and uncritical embrace that mistakes algorithmic fluency for creative vision. We argue that both are aesthetic vices: snobbery and naïveté. We propose discerning openness as the virtue that corrects them. We identify three loci of aesthetic value available to the virtuously open appreciator: the product, the human AI artist, and the AI (and its creators). Drawing on Matherne’s account of aesthetic flourishing, we argue that the capacity for such engagement is conducive to a flourishing aesthetic life in the AI era.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vlaad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: