Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The inverse energy cascade of two-dimensional turbulence is often represented phenomenologically by a Newtonian stress–strain relation with a ‘negative eddy viscosity’. Here we develop a fundamental approach to a turbulent constitutive law for the two-dimensional inverse cascade, based upon a convergent multi-scale gradient (MSG) expansion. To first order in gradients, we find that the turbulent stress generated by small-scale eddies is proportional not to strain but instead to ‘skew-strain,’ i.e. the strain tensor rotated by 45^∘ . The skew-strain from a given scale of motion makes no contribution to energy flux across eddies at that scale, so that the inverse cascade cannot be strongly scale-local. We show that this conclusion extends a result of Kraichnan for spectral transfer and is due to absence of vortex stretching in two dimensions. This ‘weakly local’ mechanism of inverse cascade requires a relative rotation between the principal directions of strain at different scales and we argue for this using both the dynamical equations of motion and also a heuristic model of ‘thinning’ of small-scale vortices by an imposed large-scale strain. Carrying out our expansion to second order in gradients, we find two additional terms in the stress that can contribute to the energy cascade. The first is a Newtonian stress with an ‘eddy-viscosity’ due to differential strain rotation, and the second is a tensile stress exerted along vorticity contour lines. The latter was anticipated by Kraichnan for a very special model situation of small-scale vortex wave-packets in a uniform strain field. We prove a proportionality in two dimensions between the mean rates of differential strain rotation and of vorticity-gradient stretching, analogous to a similar relation of Betchov for three dimensions. According to this result, the second-order stresses will also contribute to inverse cascade when, as is plausible, vorticity contour lines lengthen, on average, by turbulent advection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gregory L. Eyink (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: