Key result
A novel 3D-image based morphometry scoring system predicted adherent perinephric fat with an AUC of 0.803 (95% CI 0.758-0.848; p<0.001), comparable to the Mayo Adhesive Probability Score (AUC 0.816).
Why the study?
To develop a 3D-image based morphometry scoring system for adherent perinephric fat prediction in nephron-sparing surgery in patients with renal neoplasms.
Does a 3D-image based morphometry scoring system accurately predict Adherent Perinephric Fat in patients undergoing nephron-sparing surgery compared to the Mayo Adhesive Probability Score?
Observational (n=391)
Does a 3D-image based morphometry scoring system accurately predict Adherent Perinephric Fat in patients undergoing nephron-sparing surgery compared to the Mayo Adhesive Probability Score?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.803% vs 0.816%
p-value: p=<0.001
A novel 3D-image based morphometry scoring system demonstrates comparable diagnostic performance to the Mayo Adhesive Probability Score for predicting adherent perinephric fat in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy.
May aid preoperative planning in partial nephrectomy; leaves open prospective validation of the 3D morphometry system.
Study objective: To develop a 3D-image based morphometry scoring system for Adherent Perinephric Fat (APF) prediction in nephron-sparing surgery in renal neoplasm patients. Materials and methods: The retrospective study involved 391 patients who underwent a laparoscopic partial nephrectomy performed by five surgeons from January 2014 till December 2018. The surgery involved the 3D virtual operation planning with «Amira» 3D modeling software. With the multivariate logistic regression models, we developed a scoring system based on 3D-models. We tested the significance and sensitivity of new scoring system in a comparative ROC analysis with Mayo Adhesive Probability Score (MAP). Results: We found APF in 111 patients (28.4%). The univariate analysis revealed that significant indicators included mean age 59.88 (55–67) ( p < 0.001), male sex ( p < 0.001), Body Mass Index (BMI) >30 (21.47–35.08) kg/m 2 ( p < 0.001), arterial hypertension ( p < 0.001), coronary heart disease ( p = 0.019), diabetes mellitus ( p = 0.005), urolithiasis ( p = 0.002). The multivariate regression analysis identified three most significant indicators in 3D models evaluation: additional >5 mm shadows in perirenal space OR = 7.3 (3.6–15.3) ( p < 0.001), the number of shadows >5 OR = 3.8 (2.1–6.8) ( p < 0.001), the wide shadow base at the renal parenchymal level OR = 0.293 (0.146–0.588) ( p = 0.001). The scoring of these indicators comprises a new prediction scale (0–5). The ROC analysis revealed AUC 0.816 (95% CI 0.772–0.861) p < 0.001 of the MAP score, and AUC = 0.803 (95% CI 0.758–0.848) p < 0.001 of the scoring system developed in the present study. Conclusions: The statistical findings comparison of the scoring system that we developed with those of MAP scale suggests that the scoring system is efficient and applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sirota et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Localized renal neoplasms (n=391). 3D-image based morphometry scoring system vs. Mayo Adhesive Probability Score (MAP) was evaluated on Adherent Perinephric Fat (APF) prediction (95% CI 0.758-0.848, p=<0.001). A novel 3D-image based morphometry scoring system predicted adherent perinephric fat with an AUC of 0.803 (95% CI 0.758-0.848; p<0.001), comparable to the Mayo Adhesive Probability Score (AUC 0.816).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: