Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Context: Recognizing the personhood of people with high-support needs, such as people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) and people with late-stage dementia, is challenging due to their non-speaking communication. Yet, recognizing personhood is crucial for person-centred care. Objective: This study examines if and how personhood is reflected in the life of people with high-support needs. Method: A shadowing method was used, in which the participants were observed for two days and a running commentary was provided by the people surrounding the participants. Findings: Our research shows that all the participants had unique lives and unique stories, but some general themes and subthemes could be found and are brought together in a framework consisting of the following themes: 1) so-state; 2) person-driven including the subthemes ‘communication’, ‘behaviour’ and ‘preferences’; and 3) context-driven including the subthemes ‘care’, ‘social context’ and ‘activities’. This study highlights that personhood is relational and reflections are made on representing the knowledge of people with high-support needs. Limitations: The limited time the researcher was present in the residential care facilities, and the inclusion of only women, are limitations of this study. A reflection is also made on informed consent for people with high-support needs and the influence of the positionality of the researcher. Implications: This study demonstrates that getting to know someone with high-support needs is broader than just knowing the individual, but that the (social) context should also be considered. Elements of personhood are observable, and can be used to improve person-centred care and support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nieuwenhuis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: